Data King
Have you ever pondered what Stevie Wonder album is the world’s best? Or, which are the best TV shows to binge-watch? Do you want to know which are the most important goals in life? Or, has it even crossed your mind to wonder what people regret most about their weddings?
As the chief data scientist for Los Angeles startup Ranker.com, alumnus Ravi Iyer ’11 uses his doctorate in psychology to find empirical answers to these questions, and many others — some serious, some esoteric and some lighthearted — to which we may, openly or secretly, long to know the answers.
A consumer Internet platform that collects millions of monthly consumer opinions, Ranker is the world’s largest crowdsourcing site.
“So what Yelp does for restaurants and Trip Advisor does for hotels,” Iyer said, “we do for the rest of the world’s questions that could use a crowdsourced answer. For marketing purposes we can then cross track all these opinions, so we can say people who have these life goals enjoy these TV shows and these snack foods and beers.”
Finding wisdom in the crowd
Part of his job is both to make sure lists are accurate representations of crowd wisdom and to mine Ranker’s dataset for relationships.
“A lot of the work I do is very relevant to what I studied in psychology,” said Iyer. “It’s all about studying the opinions and behavior of people while they’re online and factor analyzing that into personality traits.”
Factor analysis is a statistical method for understanding the relationships among many related but complex variables.
When studying online behavior and opinions, a lot of the biases that emerge are reflective of psychological variables, Iyer said. “We are studying data that is generated by people, so understanding people is essential to understanding the data.”
Citing the example of how Ranker’s World Cup voters beat top statistician Nate Silver in predicting the outcome of the World Cup, Iyer said he was initially surprised by the utility of the wisdom of crowds.
“Nate Silver used statistics about player performance, but human beings are much better at taking in data, aggregating it and spitting out a reasonable answer,” he said. “Computers can be too literal.”
Crowdsourcing is the aggregation of people’s opinions. “The idea,” Iyer said, “is that the aggregated opinion of a large group of people who are less expert is actually better than any given expert.
“Research shows this is mathematically true,” he added. “That’s why Google beat Yahoo.” Google’s early algorithms incorporated users’ opinions about which web pages were best more effectively than Yahoo’s.
Building on education and life experience
An Ohio native whose parents came to the United States from India and the Philippines to get their Ph.D.s at Ohio State University, Iyer elected to attend Columbia University for his undergraduate degree. He graduated in 1996 at the height of the dot.com bubble with a bachelor’s in political science and a minor in computer science.
After working in Germany, living in the Philippines for a while and teaching English in Korea, he decided he wanted to put down roots. He moved to Los Angeles and began pursuing a doctorate in psychology at USC Dornsife.
“At the time I didn’t really know how to think about data,” Iyer said. “Psychology is a great way to learn how to understand data and especially data generated by people.”
While there, he cofounded YourMorals.org, an educational website that focuses on moral psychology, along with USC Dornsife assistant professor of psychology Jesse Graham, who was then a graduate student at the University of Virginia.
“We have tens of thousands of people coming to our site and answering questions about moral psychology in order to learn about themselves,” Iyer said. “The innovation is that we give them the chance to compare themselves to others.
“Having that understanding of the specific way that data can be used to measure people’s values is particularly useful in the tech world where the best companies are trying to solve the challenge of giving people more meaningful experiences, as opposed to just giving people more stuff.”
Iyer has several other strings to his bow. He is the co-founder of numerous academic social science projects that leverage technology to collect larger, more diverse datasets, including BeyondThePurchase.org (a consumer psychology data site), ExploringMyReligion.org (which focuses on the scientific study of religion), PsychWiki.com and VoteHelp.org.
He is also executive director of Civil Politics, a nonprofit that uses technology to bridge the divide between practitioners and researchers in moral psychology and a data science consultant for Zenzi Communications, which specializes in values-based marketing.
He remains an active researcher, having published more than 20 articles in leading peer-reviewed psychology journals over the past few years, most of which concern the empirical study of moral and political attitudes. His work has been featured in the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, the Atlantic, South by Southwest, and on NPR and the BBC.
Data as a means to real answers
“I think of data less as a marketing tool and more as a means toward fulfilling what people’s actual needs are, which increasingly are in the realm of the psychological,” he said. “Data can help identify the right audience that has the existential need that your service or offering fills.”
An example might be finding the people who would most appreciate a new local craft beer.
“That to me is the kind of thing that applying data to, and specifically applying moral psychology data to marketing, can help achieve.”
The part of Iyer’s job that he enjoys the most is the intellectual freedom it affords him.
“Since Ranker lists cover such a wide range of topics, I have the freedom to explore diverse questions. For example, we recently did an analysis on the kind of super powers people would like to have,” he said. “It’s the combination of the fast pace of the tech industry along with the ability to explore such a diverse range of topics that is really attractive about my current job.
“Still, the world is full of opportunity. If I could have five careers, I’d have no trouble thinking of five things I would love to do.”