A key issue is that of well-being and the adjacent area of mental health. Well-being is defined by the World Health Organization thusly:
“Well-being is a positive state experienced by individuals and societies. Similar to health, it is a resource for daily life and is determined by social, economic and environmental conditions. Well-being encompasses quality of life and the ability of people and societies to contribute to the world with a sense of meaning and purpose. Focusing on well-being supports the tracking of the equitable distribution of resources, overall thriving and sustainability. A society’s well-being can be determined by the extent to which it is resilient, builds capacity for action, and is prepared to transcend challenges” (WHO, 2021).
Yet, scholars continue to debate how it can be best conceptualized, and thusly measured (Jarden & Roache, 2023). Importantly, authors and the field are agreed that “well-being” matters in assessing one’s quality of life overall, and that many factors contribute to and influence our subjective sense of “well-being” as individuals.
Further, that “well-being” is not only an individual experience, but can be applied broadly as a reflection of a group or society’s overall state of being. As such, well-being in higher education should focus not only on the subjective differential experiences of each faculty, staff, or student, but on the overall state of the contexts in which they reside, study, research, teach, and learn. That we must not stop at “individual strategies to improve well-being” but take a much more holistic approach and understand that the contexts and cultures in which we pursue the academic mission have a profound effect on us as people, on our capacity to collaborate, be creative, and excel.
Critically, however, faculty and instructors are not solely responsible for the complete oversight of the well-being and mental health of their students. Let’s say that again: faculty and instructors, and to a large extent, institutions of higher education themselves, are not solely responsible for the complete oversight of the well-being and mental health of their students. Yes, faculty, instructors, staff, and institutions have an obligation to do no harm, and to provide resources, and be supportive, but faculty, instructors, and staff should not be expected to be mental health practitioners.
What faculty and instructors can do and do well, is to make clear statements at the beginning of each semester about the importance of mental health and well-being, and the way in which well-being and the academy are connected. To reflect on the importance of mental health and well-being as a student, graduate student, or faculty member. This is called healthy modeling. It is a direct challenge to toxic cultures that persist within academia of sacrifice above all else in a way that leads to rapid deterioration. It is a message to students that excellence in scholarship is a product of a healthy mind and positive social relationships, and to challenge the false choice of productivity or well-being.
Faculty and instructors can be alert to changes that suggest a student is struggling, or if a student explicitly states they need help, guide the student to the appropriate resource.
If you have a desire to learn more about this topic, please contact us to set up a time to talk about how we can support you and your department (click here).
This list reflects research in the areas of well-being. Key texts are in bold.
- Diener (1984). Subjective well-being.
- Diener & Seligman (2004). Beyond Money: Toward an Economy of Well-being
- Jarden & Roache (2023). What is Wellbeing?
- Keyes (1998). Social Well-being
- Khaneman & Krueger (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being
- Lambert et al. (2020). Towards a greater global understanding of wellbeing: a proposal for a more inclusive measure
- Ruggeri et al., (2020). Well-being is more than happiness and life satisfaction: a multidimensional analysis of 21 countries
- Ryff & Keyes (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited.
- Tov (2018). Well-being concepts and components.
- White, Sepulveda, Patterson (2021). Understanding the wellbeing of LGBTIQ+ populations
This list reflects research in the areas of well-being and mental health in higher education specifically. Key texts are in bold.
- Clabaugh et al., (2021). Academic Stress and Emotional Well-Being in United States College Students Following Onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic
- Hernandez-Torrano et al., (2020). Mental Health and Well-Being of University Students: A Bibliometric Mapping of the Literature
- Keeling (2014). An ethic of care in higher education: Well-being and learning
- Russell & Topham (2012). The impact of social anxiety on student learning and well-being in higher education
- Stratton & Miller-Perrin (2023). Mentoring, Life Purpose, and Well-Being in First-Generation College Students: Impact of Life Purpose Mentoring by Faculty
- Travia et al., (2020). Framing well-being in a college campus setting
- Trolian et al., (2020). Well-being and student–faculty interactions in higher education