Social Influence

People agree with others for a variety of reasons (Wood, 2000).  They might be trying to live up to a particular self-concept, such as the values of an ingroup (Christensen, Rothgerber, Wood, & Matz, 2004). People also might hold attitudes that support their relationships with others (Matz & Wood, 2005; Orina, Wood, & Simpson, 2004). These self and other motives form the basis for minority influence, in which people try not to align publicly with deviant outgroups (Wood, Lundgren, Ouellette, Busceme, & Blackstone, 1994). Also, classic persuasion reserach shows how people are motivated to hold attitudes that best represent their understanding of the issue (Prislin & Wood, 2005).
 
 


Electronic versions are provided as a professional courtesy to individuals in the spirit of sharing academic work for noncommercial purposes. Copyright for these papers and all associated rights continue to reside with the copyright holders, as noted in each paper.

 

Wood, W., & Hayes, T. (2012). Social influence on consumer decisions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22, 324-328. [request paper]

Hall, D. T., Matz, D., & Wood, W. (2010). Why don't we practice what we preach? A meta-analytic review of religious racism. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 126-139. [request paper]

Matz, D., & Wood, W. (2005). Cognitive dissonance in groups: The consequences of disagreement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology88, 22-37. [request paper]

Prislin, R., & Wood, W. (2005). Social influence: The role of social consensus in attitudes and attitude change. In D. Albaraccin, B. T. Johnson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Handbook of attitudes and attitude change (pp. 671-706). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. [request paper]

Christensen, P. N., Rothgerber, H., Wood, W., & Matz, D. C. (2004). Social norms and the self: A motivational model of normative impact. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1295-1309. [request paper]

Orina, M., Wood, W., & Simpson, J. A. (2002). Styles of influence in close relationships. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 459-472. [request paper]

Wood, W. (2000). Attitude change: Persuasion and social influence. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 539-570. [request paper]

Wood, W. (1999). Motives and modes of processing in the social influence of groups. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 547-570). New York: Guilford Press. [request paper]

Pool, G. J., Wood, W., & Leck, K. (1998). The self-esteem motive in social influence: Agreeing with valued majorities and disagreeing with derogated minorities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 967-975. [request paper]

Wood, W., Pool, G., Leck, K., & Purvis, D. (1996). Self-definition, defensive processing, and influence: The normative impact of majority and minority groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1181-1193. [request paper]

Wood, W., Lundgren, S., Ouellette, J., Busceme, S., & Blackstone, T. (1994). Minority influence: A meta-analytic review of social influence processes. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 323-345. [request paper]


  • Wendy Wood
  • Seeley G. Mudd Building
  • 8th Floor
  • Phone: (213) 740 - 5504