Robert Dekle and
Kyoji Fukao, “The Japan-US Exchange Rate, Productivity, and the
Competitiveness of Japanese Industries”, in Japan’s Bubble, Deflation,
and Long-term Stagnation, MIT Press (2011), edited by Koichi Hamada,
Anil K. Kashyap and David E. Weinstein.
Abstract: In this paper, we focus on the movements of the yen on Japanese
industries, and on the sectoral reallocation of Japanese employment. We
show that the appreciation episodes of 1985 and 1995 have significantly
hurt the ability of Japanese industries to compete with U.S. industries,
by raising the relative production costs of Japanese industries. This
relative cost gap with U.S. industries narrowed from 1995, owing to
faster wage growth in the U.S., and especially to higher productivity
growth in some Japanese industries. In fact, in these high productivity
Japanese manufacturing industries such as chemicals and transport
equipment, relative production costs were essentially back to pre-1985,
pre-Plaza Accord levels by 2004. In contrast, the relative production
costs of Japanese low productivity manufacturing industries such as
textiles and wood products have remained high. Clearly, in the
aggregate, the appreciation of the yen was not matched by an increase in
Japanese productivity. What then is the appreciation of the aggregate
real exchange rate consistent with these Japan-U.S. differences in
industrial productivities? To answer this question, we build a
three-sector (high productivity manufacturing, low productivity
manufacturing, and services) equilibrium macroeconomic-trade model of
Japan and the U.S. We find that while the yen was gundervaluedh before
1985, it was significantly govervaluedh after 1985, and especially since
1995. In our model simulations, the Balassa-Samuelson effect is
observed: the equilibrium real exchange rate is appreciating over time,
owing to strong relative growth in the Japanese high productivity
manufacturing sector, but very poor relative productivity growth in the
Japanese services sector. Interestingly, the continued appreciation of
the equilibrium real exchange rate meant that the actual real exchange
rate was near its equilibrium value by 2003-2004, when the nominal yen
dollar rate was about 120 yen to the dollar.
|